When Vista was released or even when it was in Beta stage there were software compatibility issues. Softwares that ran on Windows Xp were incompatible with Windows Vista. Windows Vista is designed to be more secure and softwares to run on Vista require to follow the Vista guidelines. After the release of Windows Vista, most of the Software comapanies have released an update to their products which made it compatible with Windows Vista. Software companies like Corel have released an update to their products.
Adobe on the other hand has asked its customer to pay for new Vista compatible version of many of their products. Actually Adobe has no plans to ensure that its currently shipping products work properly with Vista.
Paul Thurrott in his newsletter "WinInfo Update dated March 21" shows us how the users of Adobe products will have to pay for the updated version to achieve full Vista compatiblity. Actually many of the products cost several hundred dollars a piece.
As further mentioned in the newsletter "Critics are charging Adobe with harming customers as a payback for Micosoft's decision to compete directly with Adobe in various markets."
How can a user be charged for an update of a software to run it on a new OS when he has already purchased the sofware. It clearly shows how Adobe is following Anti-Microsoft policy and as a reason of which its users will have to suffer.
Adobe should remember that a user who pays for a product should get full support and should not suffer.
Whats your say?